# LOGARYTMY ZADANIA I ODPOWIEDZI PDF

KURS FUNKCJE WIELU ZMIENNYCH Lekcja 5 Dziedzina funkcji ZADANIE DOMOWE Strona 2 Częśd 1: TEST Zaznacz poprawną odpowiedź (tylko jedna jest logarytm, arcsinx, arccosx, arctgx, arcctgx c) Dzielenie, pierwiastek, logarytm. 4 Dlaczego maksymalizujemy sumy logarytmów prawdopodobienstw? z maksymalizacją logarytmów prawdopodobieństwa poprawnej odpowiedzi przy a priori parametrów przez prawdopodobienstwo danych przy zadanych parametrach. Zadanie 1. (1 pkt). Suma pięciu kolejnych liczb całkowitych jest równa. Najmniejszą z tych liczb jest. A. B. C. D. Rozwiązanie wideo. Obejrzyj na Youtubie.

Author: | Kazigor Godal |

Country: | Argentina |

Language: | English (Spanish) |

Genre: | Finance |

Published (Last): | 26 November 2013 |

Pages: | 281 |

PDF File Size: | 6.14 Mb |

ePub File Size: | 10.7 Mb |

ISBN: | 151-8-38302-722-5 |

Downloads: | 17165 |

Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |

Uploader: | Voodoolrajas |

Copyright for librarians – a presentation of new education offer for librarians Agenda: Then scale up all of the probability densities so that their integral comes to 1.

It assigns the complementary probability zqdania the answer 0. But what if we start with a reasonable prior over all fifth-order polynomials and use the full posterior distribution. To make predictions, let each different setting of the parameters make its own prediction and then combine all these predictions by weighting each of them by the posterior probability of that setting of the parameters. It is easier to work in the log domain.

Then renormalize to get the posterior distribution. The number of grid points is exponential in the number of parameters.

If we use just the right amount of noise, and if we let the weight vector wander around for long enough before we take a sample, we will get a sample from the true posterior over weight vectors. After evaluating each grid point we use all of them to make predictions on test data This is also expensive, but it works much better than ML learning when the posterior is vague or multimodal this happens when data is scarce.

With little data, you get odpowledzi vague predictions because many different parameters settings have significant posterior probability.

### Uczenie w sieciach Bayesa – ppt pobierz

Suppose we add some Gaussian noise to the weight vector after each update. To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. Pick the value of p that makes the observation of 53 heads and 47 tails most probable.

Suppose we observe tosses and there are 53 heads. So the weight vector never settles down. It looks for the parameters that have the greatest product of the prior term and the likelihood term. It is very widely used for fitting models in statistics. Pobierz ppt “Uczenie w sieciach Bayesa”.

The likelihood term takes into account how probable the observed data is given the parameters of the model. If you use the full posterior over parameter settings, overfitting disappears!

## Uczenie w sieciach Bayesa

Make predictions p ytest input, D by using the posterior probabilities of all grid-points to average the predictions p ytest input, Wi made by the different grid-points. Is it reasonable to give a single answer? The complicated model fits the data better. So we cannot deal with more than a few parameters using a grid. Our computations of probabilities will work much better if we take this uncertainty into account.

Maybe we can just evaluate this tiny fraction It might be good enough to just sample weight vectors according to their posterior probabilities. Multiply the prior probability of each parameter value by the probability of observing a tail given that value.

For each grid-point compute the probability of the observed outputs of all the training cases. There is no reason why the amount of data should influence our prior zsdania about the complexity of the model. This is the likelihood term and is explained on the next slide Multiply the prior for each grid-point p Wi by the likelihood term and renormalize to get the posterior probability for each grid-point p Wi,D. Then all we have to do is to maximize: It fights the prior With enough data the likelihood terms always win.

This gives the posterior distribution. Look how sensible it is! But only if you assume that fitting a model means choosing a single best setting of the parameters. Minimizing the squared weights is equivalent to maximizing the log probability of the weights under a zero-mean Gaussian maximizing prior.

If there is enough data to make most parameter vectors very unlikely, only need a tiny fraction of the grid points make a significant contribution to the predictions.

Now we get vague and sensible predictions.

## Zadanie 21 (0-3)

In this case we used a uniform distribution. If you do not have much data, you should use a simple model, because a complex one will overfit. The idea of the project Course content How to use an e-learning. This is also computationally intensive. The prior may be very vague. This is expensive, but it does not involve any gradient descent and there are no local optimum issues.

### Opracowania do zajęć wyrównawczych z matematyki elementarnej

It favors parameter settings that make the data likely. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policyincluding cookie policy. But it is not economical and it makes silly predictions.

Multiply the prior probability of each parameter value by the probability of observing a head given that value. Our model of a coin has one parameter, p. So it just scales the squared error.

Sample weight vectors with this probability. If we want to minimize a cost we use negative log probabilities: It keeps wandering around, but it tends to prefer low cost regions of logartmy weight space. We can do this by starting with a random weight vector and then adjusting it in the direction that improves p W D.