LATEX PSNFSS2E PDF

Sources, /macros/latex/required/psnfss. Documentation. README · Package documentation · Readme. Version, a. Licenses, The LaTeX Project Public. They are the same fonts. That is, the Font Catalogue also lists alternatives and extensions etc., but the basic fonts it lists are the ones you. Having read any LATEX introduction of your choice (for instance, [1]), you able in every LATEX distribution as a PDF file named

Author: Gokinos Voodoolrajas
Country: Botswana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 21 August 2018
Pages: 33
PDF File Size: 1.92 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.59 Mb
ISBN: 334-4-36527-327-2
Downloads: 64799
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akisida

Here is the relevant section: Now, formally this would give you Adobe Palatino, but, in practice, you probably don’t have this font available. Which fonts are used for the 35 PostScript fonts is configured in your TeX installation.

So what you actually get is URW Palladiol, upl. I figure the font packages listed in the Catalog are superior or have had additional work and refinements applied. URW fonts with “berry” filenames e.

Sign up using Facebook. The packages are different, for example, the catalog has Palladio a clone of Palitino, which is in psnfss Other examples are, for New Century Schoolbook: What PSNFSS actually provides are clones of the fonts listed unless you have installed alternatives and configured your installation to use them.

CTAN: Package psnfss

Either they may use them directly or they may use ‘virtual’ fonts which are TeX fonts latx combine characters from different base fonts. Post as a guest Name. It seems that the ones in the Catalog have replacements for the ones inside psnfss, The packages are different, for example, the catalog has Palladio a clone of Palitino, which is in psnfss Other examples are, for New Century Schoolbook: Sign up using Email and Password.

  INTELLIGENCE IN NATURE NARBY PDF

Here is the relevant section:. More specifically, the packages support either clones from URW or versions from Altex, depending on your font configuration. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. But the default is to use the clones which are part of TeX installations.

Are psnfss2e fonts inferior to those in The LaTeX Font Catalogue? – TeX – LaTeX Stack Exchange

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Adobe fonts with “vendor” filenames e. They are the same fonts.

So, in general, the Font Catalogue will give you a ‘best practice’ method for enabling a font. Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Adobe fonts with “berry” filenames e.

psnfss – Font support for common PostScript fonts

But the improvement is not in the fonts used – these are often identical – but, rather, in the way those fonts are configured and accessed. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

Oatex Which fonts for the “Basic 35 Laserwriter Fonts” do you want to use and how are the filenames chosen? Many font packages use different combinations of these base fonts. That is, psnfss2ee Font Catalogue also lists alternatives and extensions etc. If you wanted to use Adobe’s Palatino, psnfsss2e need to obtain it, install it and reconfigure your TeX installation’s font configuration appropriately.

  AF FORM 707B PDF

Is that the case and should I use the alternatives from the Catalog rather than from psnfss? Helvitica and Avant Garde both sans fonts are laex in the psnfss set of font packages, but not even listed in the Catalog. The Font Catalogue tends to list packages which provide more complete support e. URW fonts with “vendor” filenames e.

In others, the packages from PSNFSS are not generally the best way to access the font because a more complete solution is now provided by a newer package e. Email Required, but never shown. It seems that the ones in the Catalog have replacements for the ones inside psnfss.

This shows that I am using katex default configuration which is URW fonts with ‘berry’ file names i. In TeX Live, at least, this configuration is set in updmap. For example, mathpazo essentially sets the font family ppl for the default serif.

I noticed that the font packages within the postscript psnfss universal to all TeX distributions aren’t listed in the LaTeX Font Catalogue.